Sample listings — settlement pages on this site are illustrative examples, not real cases
HomeAutomotive & Vehicle Recalls › Garcia v. Land Rover North America
Sample settlement listing

Garcia v. Land Rover North America

Automotive & Vehicle Recalls · Filed 2025-12-27 · U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · Docket 4:25-cv-55464

Defendant companyLand Rover North America
Estimated payout per claimant$120 to $3,200
Claim deadlineJuly 31, 2026
Proof requiredVehicle Identification Number (VIN); repair receipts helpful but optional
Sample listing — not a real case. This page is an illustrative demonstration of how a class action settlement listing works. The lawsuit, docket number, deadlines, and payout figures shown here are fictional, and the company named is not actually a defendant in such a case. Do not rely on this page to file a claim.

What the company is alleged to have done

According to the federal complaint, Land Rover North America sold the affected vehicles for years while internal technical service bulletins documented the defect. Owners report the failure typically appears between 30,000 and 80,000 miles, well past the standard new-vehicle warranty.

The complaint alleges Land Rover North America failed to disclose the defect at the point of sale, in advertising materials, or in any subsequent communication with owners, even after enough complaints reached NHTSA to trigger informal regulatory scrutiny. Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide class of owners and lessees.

Who qualifies as a class member

You are likely an eligible class member if all of the following apply:

  • You purchased or leased a Land Rover North America vehicle covered by the affected VIN list (the administrator will check your VIN automatically).
  • Your vehicle was manufactured during the affected model years (typically a six-year window).
  • You were the registered owner during the warranty period or paid for a covered repair out of pocket.
  • You are a U.S. resident and bought or leased the vehicle in the United States.

If you fit all of the criteria above, you almost certainly have a valid claim. If you only fit some of them — for example, you used the product in a different timeframe, or you don’t have proof of purchase — you may still qualify under the settlement’s “self-attestation” rules.

How much can I receive?

Class members can claim three benefits: (1) free repair at any authorized Land Rover North America dealer for affected VINs; (2) reimbursement for documented out-of-pocket repairs already paid; and (3) a cash payment for the diminished resale value of vehicles owned during the warranty period.

Total settlement value: $11M. Estimated number of class members: 750,000. Most class members will receive their payout by check or electronic transfer within four to nine months after the court grants final approval.

How to file your claim (step-by-step)

  1. Look up your VIN on the settlement administrator's website to confirm eligibility.
  2. Gather repair invoices showing any out-of-pocket repairs related to the alleged defect.
  3. Submit the claim form online before the deadline.
  4. Choose direct deposit or paper check for any cash reimbursement.
  5. Keep your confirmation number — you will need it to schedule the free dealer repair.
Reminder — sample listing: Claim Alert Hub is not a settlement administrator, and this page does not describe a real case. In a real settlement, the court-approved notice from the official administrator is the only document to rely on.

Why this matters

Vehicle-defect cases like this one are how owners recover money for repairs that the manufacturer's warranty failed to cover. Without the class action, most owners would simply absorb the cost.

In a real settlement of this kind, you would file directly with the court-appointed administrator at no cost. For a deeper walkthrough of the federal class-action timeline, read our guide on what happens after you submit a claim form.


Related open settlements

Automotive & Vehicle Recalls

Johnson v. Continental Tire

Owners of certain Continental Tire vehicles allege a manufacturing defect that caused premature failures, costly out-of-pocket repairs, and diminished resale value. The…

Automotive & Vehicle Recalls

Greene v. Volvo Cars USA

Owners of certain Volvo Cars USA vehicles allege a manufacturing defect that caused premature failures, costly out-of-pocket repairs, and diminished resale value.…

Automotive & Vehicle Recalls

O'Brien v. GMC (GM)

Owners of certain GMC (GM) vehicles allege a manufacturing defect that caused premature failures, costly out-of-pocket repairs, and diminished resale value. The…

Automotive & Vehicle Recalls

Franklin v. Kia America Inc.

Owners of certain Kia America Inc. vehicles allege a manufacturing defect that caused premature failures, costly out-of-pocket repairs, and diminished resale value.…

📘 Learn how class action claims work. Free plain-English guides and sample listings. How to File a Claim