Sample listings — settlement pages on this site are illustrative examples, not real cases
HomeRetail & Consumer Goods › Jackson v. GOAT Group
Sample settlement listing

Jackson v. GOAT Group

Retail & Consumer Goods · Filed 2025-08-29 · U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington · Docket 1:25-cv-20343

Defendant companyGOAT Group
Estimated payout per claimant$5 to $35 (no receipt)
Claim deadlineJune 25, 2026
Proof requiredSelf-attestation acceptable; order confirmation or receipt unlocks higher payout
Sample listing — not a real case. This page is an illustrative demonstration of how a class action settlement listing works. The lawsuit, docket number, deadlines, and payout figures shown here are fictional, and the company named is not actually a defendant in such a case. Do not rely on this page to file a claim.
Deadline approaching: This claim window closes on June 25, 2026. Late claims are typically rejected by the settlement administrator.

What the company is alleged to have done

The complaint alleges GOAT Group prominently advertised features, origins, or product attributes that an independent investigation showed were inaccurate. Plaintiffs argue the marketing claims drove the purchase decision and inflated the price.

The proposed settlement covers all U.S. consumers who purchased the affected products during the class period. GOAT Group also agreed to discontinue the contested marketing claim and to fund a corrective notice program.

Who qualifies as a class member

You are likely an eligible class member if all of the following apply:

  • You purchased one of the affected GOAT Group products in the United States during the class period.
  • You bought the products for personal use (not for resale).
  • You attest that you would not have paid the premium price had you known the marketing claim was inaccurate.

If you fit all of the criteria above, you almost certainly have a valid claim. If you only fit some of them — for example, you used the product in a different timeframe, or you don’t have proof of purchase — you may still qualify under the settlement’s “self-attestation” rules.

How much can I receive?

Tiered payout structure with a base no-proof claim and a higher with-proof tier for class members who can produce receipts, credit-card statements, or online order confirmations.

Total settlement value: $78M. Estimated number of class members: 750,000. Most class members will receive their payout by check or electronic transfer within four to nine months after the court grants final approval.

How to file your claim (step-by-step)

  1. Confirm the products you purchased during the class period.
  2. Gather receipts, statements, or order confirmations (optional but unlocks higher payout).
  3. Submit the online claim form with your contact information.
  4. Upload any supporting documentation.
  5. Choose your preferred payment method.
Reminder — sample listing: Claim Alert Hub is not a settlement administrator, and this page does not describe a real case. In a real settlement, the court-approved notice from the official administrator is the only document to rely on.

Why this matters

Retail false-advertising cases generate small individual payouts but create real label-reform pressure on the affected companies.

In a real settlement of this kind, you would file directly with the court-appointed administrator at no cost. For a deeper walkthrough of the federal class-action timeline, read our guide on what happens after you submit a claim form.


Related open settlements

Retail & Consumer Goods

Stevens v. J.Crew Group

Shoppers who purchased certain J.Crew Group products allege the marketing claims on the packaging or website were materially false and that they…

Retail & Consumer Goods

Zimmerman v. Stop & Shop

Shoppers who purchased certain Stop & Shop products allege the marketing claims on the packaging or website were materially false and that…

Retail & Consumer Goods

Williams v. Albertsons Companies

Shoppers who purchased certain Albertsons Companies products allege the marketing claims on the packaging or website were materially false and that they…

Retail & Consumer Goods

Sullivan v. Giant Food Stores

Shoppers who purchased certain Giant Food Stores products allege the marketing claims on the packaging or website were materially false and that…

📘 Learn how class action claims work. Free plain-English guides and sample listings. How to File a Claim